DevLabs vs Juicebox

Two very different ways to find talent.

Juicebox starts with the talent market. DevLabs starts with builders. That sounds like a small difference, but it changes almost everything about how the products work.

Start hiring Compare options

Depth first DevLabs

Start with proof of work.

Built for founders hiring early engineers, where the real question is whether this person can actually build with the team.

Projects and demos
GitHub and technical work
Hackathons, hacker houses, and agent traces

Breadth first Juicebox

Start with talent search.

Useful for recruiting teams that need to source broadly, build large pipelines, and search across a large talent market.

Professional profiles
Recruiting data
Large-scale sourcing workflows

The search question

Juicebox Who matches the query?

DevLabs Who has actually shown useful builder signal?

The hiring moment

Juicebox Large pipeline creation

DevLabs Engineer #2, #4, or #8 at a startup

The founder output

Juicebox More people to review

DevLabs A shorter list worth calling

Where Juicebox makes more sense

If you have a recruiting team and need to build a large pipeline across lots of roles, broad search is useful. You want reach. You want filters. You want sourcing infrastructure. Juicebox was built around that problem.

Where DevLabs makes more sense

We're much narrower. DevLabs is for founders and small teams making important technical hires. The person you hire might be engineer #2, #4, or #8. At that stage, the question is usually not: "Can I find 200 more software engineers?" It is: "Which five of these people would I actually trust to build this company with me?" That's the problem we care about.

The simplest way to think about it

Juicebox gives you breadth. DevLabs tries to give you depth. Sometimes you need the first. For early startup engineering hires, we think the second matters a lot more.